What are you wa’an?

judgevinnyjacket

 

 

 

 

 

We begin this post, which is about a very, very unfunny topic, with a funny reference to one of the funniest movies ever, in our opinion:

The movie is “My Cousin Vinny”, and the scene we draw you to is the one in which the judge asks first-time lawyer Vinny Gambini (played with precise comic timing by Joe Pesci) what he is wearing:

Vinny Gambini: My clients…

Judge Chamberlain Haller: What are you wearing (note: the Judge pronounces this ‘wa’an‘, in a southern US drawl)?

Vinny Gambini: Huh?

Judge Chamberlain Haller: What are you wearing? (Less accent this time)

Vinny Gambini: [wearing a black leather jacket] Um… I’m wearing clothes.

[the Judge angrily stares ominously at Vinny]

Vinny Gambini: I… I don’t get the question.

Judge Chamberlain Haller: When you come into my court looking like you do, you not only insult me, but you insult the integrity of this court!

Vinny Gambini: I apologize, sir, but, uh… this is how I dress.

Judge Chamberlain Haller: Fine. I’ll let you off this one time. The next time you appear in my court, you will look lawyerly. And I mean you comb your hair, and wear a suit and tie. And that suit had better be made out of some sort of… cloth. You understand me?

Vinny Gambini: [not comprehending] Uh… yes. Fine, Judge, fine.

We ask that your takeaway from this comic scene is simply, “what are you wearing” – and instead of decorum, the question this time is – have you thought about the sustainability aspects of the clothing you purchase and wear?  Or, perhaps your business – or your project – requires the use of cloth or leather or other resources.  What’s their source?  Is the production of that material “okay”?

By “okay”, we refer to the classic project management and business concerns, like, is it going to be of consistent quality, a good price, and of reliable availability?  But in light of recent events in Bangladesh (1,100 workers killed at Rana Plaza) and Cambodia (shoe workers killed in building collapse)  we suggest that the “what are you wa’an” question also considers whether or not the resource or material is sustainable from the perspective of fair trade, of fair labor, of safe working conditions.

Have a look at this collection of stories from the UK’s Guardian newspaper regarding the recent tragedies in south Asia related to poor – and unsustainable – working conditions in that part of the world.

Notice also the ‘teaser’ for this list of stories:

“The collapse of a factory in Bangladesh has put sustainability in the fashion industry back on the agenda”

Cambodia shoe factory collapse kills workers
On Thursday 16 May a ceiling came down at Wing Star Shoes plant in Cambodia, killing at least two people. The latest in a long line of industrial accidents killing workers in the fashion industry making garments for the west.

Fashion chains sign to help finance safety in Bangladesh factories
Will the collapse of the Rana Plaza building lead to a change in practice? Some of the world’s biggest fashion chains, including H&M, Zara, C&A, Tesco and Primark, have signed up to a legally-binding agreement to help finance fire safety and building improvements in the factories they use in Bangladesh. The government in Dhaka has also announced plans to raise the the minimum wage for garment workers.

Eight top fashion retailers fail to sign Bangladesh safety accord
A number of retailers failed to put their names to a Bangladesh safety pact, including Marks & Spencer, Sainsbury’s and New Look.

Bangladesh building collapse: woman rescued after 17 days speaks of ordeal – video
A woman found alive in the rubble of Dhaka’s Rana Plaza after 17 days tells how she got rescuers’ attention with a stick as she heard voices above her.

Bangladesh building collapse – pictures
Devastating photographs of the Rana Plaza collapse which killed more than 1,100 people in April 2013.

Fashion doesn’t give a damn about garment workers
Thought-provoking comment piece by Lucy Siegle – author of To Die For: Is Fashion Wearing Out the World – which gives an insight into the fashion industry and how the world’s 40 million garment workers work to try and complete near-impossible orders.

Was your T-shirt made in the Dhaka garment factory? You have no idea
Applying any ethical criteria is challenging when it comes to fashion – so isn’t it time we had Fairtrade labelling for clothes?

Death in Bangladesh is too high a price for quick-fix fashion
Blog by 18 year-old fashion lover on how she has stopped buying cheap clothes. She points out teenagers’ spending power is worth £7bn a year – imagine if that were channelled into buying fewer well-made clothes produced under fair wages.

Time for an international minimum wage
Bangladeshi writer Muhammad Yunus’ insightful comment piece is great for sixth formers who want to delve deeper into the how foreign buyers can unite to lift workers out of ‘slave labour’.

The deaths of thousands of workers due to short-term thinking reminds us that sustainability is about much more than the climate and “green” but about long-term thinking in general.

We ask that:

As an individual, consider your clothing purchases.  A boycott of goods from these countries is probably counter-productive.  The clothing industry in countries like Bangladesh has indeed improved the quality of life.  Instead, ask questions, push for more accountability from the retail stores, fashion brand names, and mass marketers.  Push them to sign up for controls and limits and commitment to sustainability and fair trade in manufacturing.

As a project manager, turn off your natural propensity for the ‘project timeline blinders’ which we often put on – for all the right reasons.  Take them off from time to time and look around.

Maybe we all need to be more like the Judge and ask – what are we wa’an?

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 10.0/10 (4 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Net Positive

netpoz

What do you think of this goal:

…’to create a net positive impact on the environment by “putting more back in than we take out.”’…

Well, this is the Net Positive program of Kingfisher, plc.

If you haven’t heard of Kingfisher, it’s the third-largest DIY store chain after Home Depot and Lowe’s.  Kingfisher, based in London, has over 1,000 stores in 8 countries in Europe and Asia (but not [yet] North America).

If you have time, we suggest that you watch this webinar (1 hour-ish).

If you don’t have time, listen to the beginning at which the Kingfisher CEO talks about how this is NOT a sustainability program – but rather is sustainability integrated into the company’s business plan, day-to-day operations, and (importantly to us) part of their project culture.

It’s also about innovation – as we have increasingly seen (check our book or scores of our previous blog posts – here at EarthPM, and at our Projects@Work section) about that connection between innovation and sustainability).

Here’s a quote from the CEO of Kingfisher:

“We would never do anything without involving the mainstream business because they understand the market. When we have a new idea, we’ll develop it in tandem with the mainstream business. Then we’ll start with a small-scale experiment. We test, retest, change direction, reshape.”

Guess what that experiment is, folks.  It’s a project.   And the word project is prevalent in the descriptions coming from Kingfisher about the Net Positive effort.

Here’s a sample of the work Kingfisher has done:

“For example, a couple years ago we tested a strategy for selling energy-efficient products. In two stores in the U.K., we built a store-within-a-store that sold products like draft excluders and sleeves for insulating boilers. We tried that for six months, then realized we should shift to a service offering. Now, we assess customers’ homes and install energy-efficient upgrades, rather than just selling the products and letting them do the work themselves.

The new offering is in five stores. It’s a booth manned by two specially trained staff who can walk customers through a computer program that helps them assess the products they could use to upgrade their homes and the amount of money they could save. Customers can book a full assessment, and they can contract with us or another third party to have the work done. We’ll roll it out to 50 stores by the end of the year, and take the learnings from those stores to roll it out to the whole U.K.”

Again, rather than write much more about this, we draw your attention to the webinar which you can play at your own convenience.  To us, this looks like a good example of a company threading their ‘Purpose’ all the way to ‘Operations’, via portfolios of programs and projects.

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 7.8/10 (4 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
Posted in Enterprising enterprises - businesses doing the right thing | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Two new videos featuring PM leaders we admire

TV

In our teaching and consulting we run across some folks who are outstanding in what they do – and we admire that. We’re lucky enough to have met these gentlemen and we can tell you that they know of what they speak!

Without much introduction, we’d like to point your attention to two videos today, one each from these folks.  The videos were only recently uploaded to YouTube.

The first is a great video simply introducing our field – project management – to the world.  Greg Balestrero, former PMI CEO and now (and we love this title) Strategic Advisor – Corporate Consciousness, Sustainability and Leadership at IIL (International Institute for Learning), is your host on a tour-de-force of PM’s history, present, and future.

The next is by an exuberant speaker  and PM expert Ricardo Vargas, from Brazil, author of 11 books on Project Management and creator of several very short but effective YouTube videos on diverse PM topics.  In this one, he takes you through the 5th Edition PMBOK(R) Guide in a unique and powerful way.

Enjoy!

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 9.0/10 (4 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
Posted in Enterprising enterprises - businesses doing the right thing, Reviews | Tagged | Leave a comment

Greenwishing? Greenwashing? Or Green?

 

gigo

Isn’t it interesting how air travel works?

You fly thousands, sometimes many thousands of miles (or kilometers), land, taxi to the gate and wait, either for a gate or a jetway.  The last few steps of your journey are tantalizingly close but somehow that last piece never gets done.

Last week, it was a jetway.  No jetway.  So we waited for the last 0.0001% of our journey to be bridged by what in effect is a large straw on wheels to roll up to the plane.  While we waited, I read United’s Hemispheres magazine. in particular, the CEO Letter, which caught my eyes because it was entitled “Eco-Skies in Action“.  Nice story.

In it, Chairman, President, and CEO of United Airlines, Jeff Smisek has compiled what appear to be some striking statistics to boast about:

  • reducing fuel consumption by 85 million gallons this year
  • using lighter products, ground power instead of onboard auxiliary power
  • improved flight planning
  • investing in 150 new 737 fuel-efficient aircraft
  • being the launch customer for the new Split Scimitar winglet which reduce fuel burn by 2 to 5 percent
  • Headquarters in Chicago is LEED certifed
  • Eco-Grants initiative gives 10 $50K cash grants to 10 local environmental organizations  associated with employees
  • and the list goes on

And this was going to be our post for this week.

Until.

Until what?  Until we noticed this posting on the FlyingClean website.  In this post, which we encourage you to read, we see a story behind this story.  Now we’re not saying that United should NOT be recognized for the work they are doing.  Of course they should be applauded for their efforts.

But – and this is where the connection to project management comes in – it’s important to look behind estimates, specs, requirements and other numbers like that to get the real story.

Here’s the key snippet from that posting:

“And the real story for United Airlines, is that they are actively and aggressively fighting a plan in the European Union that would reduce pollution on all flights going in and out of Europe.  This plan would save 200 million tons of carbon pollution from being emitted into the air in one year.  By comparison, all the activities United outlines in its “Eco Skies” project are aimed at achieving a reduction of 828,750 tons of carbon pollution in one year.  In other words, United is blocking a policy that would achieve carbon reductions 240 times greater than the current goal it is touting.”

Personally, I think part of the problem is that carbon pollution is measured in such large numbers that average laypeople can be satiated by what sound like gigantic sums, like 85 million gallons or 828,750 tons.  In this case that ‘s 0.83 million tons, when we’re dealing with hundreds of millions of tons when it comes to airlines – because they’re such a carbon fuel-intensive industry.

In any case we think this is a good reminder that when it comes to information presented to us as project managers, whether it’s sustainability info like this, or an estimate for refurbishing a machine part, or a vague requirement from a customer – that it’s our job to push back, dig deeper, and validate the information, otherwise we are working with bad input.

Beware!  As our blog post photo shows… Garbage In – Garbage Out.

 

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 8.2/10 (5 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
Posted in Commentary, EarthPM Presentations, General Earth PM Postings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Boston: well-known home of the …. Redwood Tree?

boston-sequoia

This picture is not (yet) real. But… it could be… sorta… read on….

 

By now the events at the end of the Boston Marathon and the movie-like days following them are known by most of our audience.  As a New England based business we experienced this strange and horrifying week and now want to – and will – get back to everyday life.

Speaking of “to life’, a very interesting story popped up today on a National Public Radio (NPR) show called “Here and Now”, hosted by Boston’s own Robin Young.

The segment was about the cloning and planting of Redwood trees around the world.  You can learn more here from the show itself.

Regarding the trees themselves, the archives are the work of David Milarch, co-founder of the Archangel Ancient Tree Archive in Michigan, and the subject of the book “The Man Who Planted Trees.”

The connection to Boston came at the very beginning of Young’s interview with Milarch.  Before he let Robin ask him any questions, he said that he wanted to donate three 3000 to 4000-year old tree clones, valued at tens of thousands of dollars each, to the City of Boston, to honor the victims and heroes of the event, and aid in the rejuvenation of Boston.  It is, as we say here, wicked awesome!

“We were told by most of the world’s scientists that this is impossible. Trying to ask a 2,000-year-old or 3,000-year-old tree to reproduce itself is akin to having a 110-year-old woman have a baby,” Milarch told Here & Now’s Robin Young.

Milarch didn’t believe the naysayers and kept trying.

 

A clone of a 3,000-year-old redwood tree, growing in a small jar. (David Milarch)

A clone of a 3,000-year-old redwood tree, growing in a small jar. (David Milarch)

 

“We had thousands of failures until finally we got the right combination,” he said.

Giant sequoias are among the fastest-growing trees on the planet, Milarch said, and absorb more carbon dioxide than other trees.

His goal, he said, is to help offset the excess carbon in the atmosphere and produce more oxygen by reforesting the planet.

In addition to the redwoods, the Archangel Ancient Tree Archive is cloning 70 other tree species.

Now you may recognize that our book has a tree on its cover.  So we are particularly fond of this story.  In fact, talk about a “green by definition” project!  This is clearly one.

Below is a radio player – you can actually listen to the (very short) piece (about a very tall subject) yourself.

 

 

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 10.0/10 (3 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
Posted in Commentary, Enterprising enterprises - businesses doing the right thing, PM News | Leave a comment