Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Tag Archive: power


In our book, we wrote about DESERTEC.

It’s nice to see that it’s:

  • more than a dream
  • employing project managers
  • employing project team workers
  • setting an example for renewable energy

See this really nice and very new video:

 

Note the aspects of social, economic, and ecological sustainability involved.

And note the importance of project management to the effort.

THIS is a good example of a solid intersection of sustainability and project management.

What do you think?

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

solar3

Our US Department of the Interior announced yesterday (16-December-2010) that it has drafted a new environmental policy to expedite large-scale solar power projects in six western states.

The policy, known as the Draft Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS), designates 24 sites on public lands in Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada and Utah for renewable energy projects.

We’re not talking about small potatoes here.  This is about over 100 active solar applications covering 1 million acres that developers estimate could generate 60,000 megawatts of electricity.

Why should you care?

Well, if for no other reason: job security. Does this effort trigger projects (and therefore the need for project managers)?  Well, perhaps this will help answer that question.  The 32 page Introduction section of the PEIS document contains the word project of program over 150 times.

Presentation on the document structure:

Click here for a short video on how to use the document.

Link to full PEIS document:

Click here for the full document.

Click here for a set of Questions and Answers on the program.

As we have continued to assert – climate change cynic, or earthy enthusiastic environmentalist, as a project manager, you are best off – and importantly, best suited - to ride the green wave.  Start riding.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

overhead linesYes.  That’s a real sign.  And yes, it appears to be placed there by none other than Captain Obvious, champion of all that is, well – clear for all to see without further explanation.

But sometimes obvious answers stay mysteriously hidden.  Any time you see an innovation and say – either out loud, or to yourself – “now why didn’t I think of that?”, you have experienced a Captain Obvious moment.

So as we browsed today’s papers, we came across this article.  Here is the article’s first line:

With a name like General Electric, it stands to reason GE would want to embrace the electric car.

Um.  Hello?  Yes.  It does indeed.  On further reading, we realized that this is not only an example of Captain Obvious at work, it was an example of one of EarthPM’s assertions.  Roughly stated, this assertion says that ‘the right thing to do helps you do things right’.  In this case, GE’s use of electric cars in their own fleet is not only going to save them gasoline and money, it will drive up the demand for the very products that they want to innovate and sell.

This seems like a pretty easy decision, n’est pas?

The CEO, Jeffrey Immelt, said the company “would convert half of its corporate fleet to electric vehicles by 2015 in an effort to give the nascent technology a jump start and help develop a potentially big new market”.  Give the technology a jump start.  Nice pun.  But it’s not punny – it’s about money. GE’s own estimates show that this expanding market will earn GE $500 million in revenue over the next three years.  So it does seem obvious to (as PMI puts it) enhance the opportunity.

Here’s a little more of the article:

Electric cars are cheaper to fuel and operate than gasoline-powered cars, but they are about twice as expensive to buy, mainly because of the high cost of batteries. The battery that powers the $33,000 Nissan Leaf costs about $12,000, nearly the price of a gasoline-powered car the Leaf’s size.

Carmakers hope to be able to sharply reduce the cost of the batteries over time, but in order to do so they need to sell more electric cars.

That’s where GE comes in. GE is hoping that its planned purchase will help drive down costs by increasing production volumes and assuring carmakers that they will have at least one big buyer.

So GE becomes a customer of GM (and perhaps Nissan?).  They increase the market for the cars, which drives the demand for the batteries, which GE develops and sells to GM and Nissan… get the picture?

Our question to project managers and others out there reading this: do you have any “Overhead Lines Above”?  Do you have any Captain Obvious ideas like this?  For example, if you work on a project that is directly or indirectly related to the electric power grid, are the vehicles in that project’s fleet electric?  Wouldn’t it make sense, thinking in the long term, for those vehicles to be electric even if their initial cost is higher, since after all, the grid’s demands will be increased by electric cars?

Just asking the Captain Obvious questions…

And you should too.

Quick.  Look UP!  There are overhead lines above!

We close this posting with a quote from none other than Captain Obvious:

“Indeed, current events may become past events, but always remember that there will, now and always, be future events in the future.”

~ Captain Obvious on the future
VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

electricelectricAs we often do here on EarthPM, we are going to combine a couple of pertinent and important themes to hopefully strengthen some points that are key to each of them.

The two themes we relate here are:

  • Electric Smart Grids for effective power transmission and reduced carbon footprint
  • High-powered Grids of Smart PMs to gain a bigger collective and personal footprint

Smart-grids for power

PM Network magazine, the monthly instrument of PMI, this month (June) features a couple of really good articles on Smart Grid projects.  If you do nothing else as a result of this posting, plunk yourself down and read “Intelligent Design” and  “A Closer Look”, on pages 36 and 43, respectively.  Both articles speak to the number and increasing importance of these projects and the ways in which project managers are making a big difference in deploying these systems.

Some highlights:

  • China will be spending, in 2010 alone, over US$ 7 billion in smart-grid technology.  Their first smart-grid project has already begun, in the city of Tianjin, under the auspices of State Grid corporation.
  • In Ontario, Canada, every single home and small business will have a smart meter installed by the end of the year.  That’s a project worth CA$ 1 billion.
  • In the US, 100 grants that total over US$ 3 billion were announced last October
  • Similar projects and grants are planned for the European Union.

If any of this intrigues you, either technically, or as a project manager, have a look at this nifty interactive package put together by the US Department of Energy.

If you don’t think it’s smart to get smart about smart grids, how about this quote, taken directly from the above US DOE document:

“Time is of the essence: We literally cannot afford the grid as it stands.
The costs of new generation and delivery infrastructure are climbing sharply. According to The Brattle Group – a consulting group that specializes in economics, finance, and regulation – investments totaling approximately $1.5 trillion will be required over the next 20 years to pay for the infrastructure alone.”

So one can tell that opportunities will abound for those project managers who learn about this technology and get smart about it themselves.


Networking power (smart-grids) for PMs

I cannot begin this section without a shoutout to Bas de Bar, my favorite source for Social Networking intelligence and its power for project managers.  You literally do yourself a disservice by not staying in touch, at least periodically, with his site: Project Shrink.  But we would also encourage you to take action.  And you can do that.  Now.

If you are not on LinkedIn, get on.  Today.  Why are you putting that off?  With newly-tweaked groups and group discussions, there are numerous ways to find a special interest group for yourself, even within our fairly specific world of project management.  For example, one of the EarthPM founders started a group on LinkedIn strictly for people who blog on project management.  He expected maybe 10 or 12 people to join and to have a healthy discussion on that very specific topic.  That group, PM Bloggers, was started less than two  years ago.  It now is approaching 800 (yes, eight hundred) members.  Some of the groups we suggest below have hundreds of thousands of members.  Taken together, we’re talking about literally millions of years of PM experience.  Is that power, or what?

As for green project management, there are several groups that we encourage you to join today and to subscribe to the discussions.  You can also choose, as we have here at EarthPM, to join general groups that focus on green business or sustainability, because as above – the opportunites to be aware of are in general industry and it pays to be aware of what general industry is doing – that’s where the projects come from, after all.  Below is a list of LinkedIn groups we suggest you explore.  Of course, you have to join LinkedIn first – which is free and has had no ill side effects on anyone we know.  It’s not a virus.  It’s not yichhy.  It’s power, plain and simple – network power.  Just have a look at the jobs posted there.  In fact, we did that for you today – keeping our combined theme in mind – and ran a search for “grid project” and came up with 4 pages full of jobs, including this one for a project manager in California that looks pretty interesting.  That’s just a sample of the power of LinkedIn – and LinkedIn is only one of many social networking opportunities which bring power to project managers individually and collectively.  Elizabeth Harrin, author and creator of PM for Girls, has a survey that captures some of that data around this power at her blog, here.

List of LinkedIn Groups

Hope this post has been helpful to you – it’s one that allows you to take action today to make yourself and your profession more powerful.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 9.5/10 (4 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)

unfairadvantage

“Clean tech is always in a boom-and-bust cycle,’’ said Matt Moscardi, manager of investor programs at Ceres, a green investment coalition based in Boston. “Without a price on carbon, or some other mechanism by which you measure pollutants and emissions, the playing field will not be level.’’ [Reference: Boston Globe article, 9-Mar10]

The ’tilted playing field’ or unfair advantage alluded to by Ceres is also referred to as clean energy’s “competitive conundrum”.  Since clean energy costs are higher than those available from conventional sources, what is going to convince a typical consumer to pay that higher price?  And, are those lower prices from conventional sources truly reflective of the true ‘price‘ of their service, including emissions?  It’s not easy or convenient for consumers to think of it this way, but when they ‘save’ money on low energy costs, they’re paying for it later in tax dollars and cleanup efforts that result from the dirtier sources of power – not to mention the ‘intangible’ loss in ‘quality of life’ for this and future generations.  I know… it sounds a little preachy, but it’s true.

From the referenced article:

Paul Maeder, cofounder of the venture capital firm Highland Capital Partners of Lexington, agreed, saying that when it comes to backing clean technology, he focuses on the long-term because venture capital investments often can take several years to pay off.

The best thing the government can do, he said, is institute something like a cap-and-trade system – which forces regulated companies to pay for the pollution they emit – to bring consistency to the world of clean tech.
What is clean tech, by the way?

cleanenergy

Actually, we found a site full of interesting research on this subject from a source called CleanEdge.  Visit this site for a full list of reports. We answer the question “what is clean tech?” after reading here, and share the key figure in this posting.  The report goes on to discuss the same issues as the referenced Globe article with respect to an ‘unfair advantage’.

If this topic interests you and you’d like to read some expert analysis and opinion regarding leveling the playing field for clean energy – thus triggering a flurry of new projects – go to this link from the National Journal, entitled “What’s a Winning Stragegy for Renewables?”, in which 17 different experts give their readout on the situation.
There, you can vote and choose to agree with the experts that most reflect your view on the subject.  Happy climbing, and let’s hope we see more of these clean tech projects get started!

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Powered by WordPress & ecm design