| I know it is self serving, but facts can be verified. From their website: http://www.safecleanreliable.com/index.htm
“Vermont Yanke In the United States alone nuclear energy accounts for about 72 percent of all U.S. emission-free generation. According to NEI, generating electricity is the single largest source of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States, representing 41 percent of all emissions. As the issue of global warming continues to capture the focus of America and the world, it is vitally important to look at the role nuclear can play in reducing the greenhouse gas emissions that continue to pollute the air and damage our ecosystem. In fact, electricity generated by nuclear avoids almost 700 million metric tons of carbon dioxide per year in the U.S. This is nearly as much carbon dioxide as is released from all U.S. passenger cars. In thinking about energy and the powerful role it plays in ensuring the quality of the environment, we are compelled to look at the carbon footprint of various energy sources. Life-cycle analysis is a mechanism for measuring the total environmental impact of various energy sources. This includes emissions resulting from all aspects of each energy source-construction, operation, dismantling and disposal. The life-cycle impact of nuclear energy is among the lowest of any form of electricity generation, comparable with renewable technologies such as wind and solar power.” |
|
e is committed to keeping Vermont’s environment strong and healthy. The safe and reliable operation of the plant helps ensure that the state’s abundant and beautiful forests, rivers, and lakes are not damaged by acid rain. According to the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), in 2008, Vermont Yankee avoided the emission of 6,500 tons of sulfur dioxide, 1,400 tons of nitrogen oxides and 2.8 million metric tons of CO2. Since 2005, Vermont Yankee has been contributing to Vermont’s “Clean Energy Fund,” and by 2012, VY will have contributed about $35 million, providing money for the development of renewable energy sources in VT.
Climbing cleanly from the competitive conundrum
“Clean tech is always in a boom-and-bust cycle,’’ said Matt Moscardi, manager of investor programs at Ceres, a green investment coalition based in Boston. “Without a price on carbon, or some other mechanism by which you measure pollutants and emissions, the playing field will not be level.’’ [Reference: Boston Globe article, 9-Mar10]
The ’tilted playing field’ or unfair advantage alluded to by Ceres is also referred to as clean energy’s “competitive conundrum”. Since clean energy costs are higher than those available from conventional sources, what is going to convince a typical consumer to pay that higher price? And, are those lower prices from conventional sources truly reflective of the true ‘price‘ of their service, including emissions? It’s not easy or convenient for consumers to think of it this way, but when they ‘save’ money on low energy costs, they’re paying for it later in tax dollars and cleanup efforts that result from the dirtier sources of power – not to mention the ‘intangible’ loss in ‘quality of life’ for this and future generations. I know… it sounds a little preachy, but it’s true.
From the referenced article:
Paul Maeder, cofounder of the venture capital firm Highland Capital Partners of Lexington, agreed, saying that when it comes to backing clean technology, he focuses on the long-term because venture capital investments often can take several years to pay off.
The best thing the government can do, he said, is institute something like a cap-and-trade system – which forces regulated companies to pay for the pollution they emit – to bring consistency to the world of clean tech.
What is clean tech, by the way?
Actually, we found a site full of interesting research on this subject from a source called CleanEdge. Visit this site for a full list of reports. We answer the question “what is clean tech?” after reading here, and share the key figure in this posting. The report goes on to discuss the same issues as the referenced Globe article with respect to an ‘unfair advantage’.
If this topic interests you and you’d like to read some expert analysis and opinion regarding leveling the playing field for clean energy – thus triggering a flurry of new projects – go to this link from the National Journal, entitled “What’s a Winning Stragegy for Renewables?”, in which 17 different experts give their readout on the situation.
There, you can vote and choose to agree with the experts that most reflect your view on the subject. Happy climbing, and let’s hope we see more of these clean tech projects get started!