Our US Department of the Interior announced yesterday (16-December-2010) that it has drafted a new environmental policy to expedite large-scale solar power projects in six western states.
The policy, known as the Draft Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS), designates 24 sites on public lands in Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada and Utah for renewable energy projects.
We’re not talking about small potatoes here. This is about over 100 active solar applications covering 1 million acres that developers estimate could generate 60,000 megawatts of electricity.
Why should you care?
Well, if for no other reason: job security. Does this effort trigger projects (and therefore the need for project managers)? Well, perhaps this will help answer that question. The 32 page Introduction section of the PEIS document contains the word project of program over 150 times.
As we have continued to assert – climate change cynic, or earthy enthusiastic environmentalist, as a project manager, you are best off – and importantly, best suited – to ride the green wave. Start riding.
The California vote â€œsignifies the largest public referendum on clean energy legislation. Tom Steyer, co-chairman of the NO on 23 campaign, stated â€œIn the midst of a major economic downturn, and with a barrage of fear mongering and scare tactics, voters still said they want a clean energy future.â€â€ from Solar Novus Today (www.solarnovus.com)
Californians rejected the attempt to suspend the stateâ€™s global warming law signed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. The defeat was by a significant margin, 39 percent to 61 percent, with 93 percent of the precincts counted, according to the Associated Press.
The San Francisco Chronicle states that; â€œThe vote clears the way for a state law restricting greenhouse-gas emissions to go into effect in 2012. The law requires the state cut emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. It will require utilities to get almost a third of their electricity from renewable sources such as solar panels, and create a market for carbon-dioxide pollution permits. Proposition 23 was “the largest public referendum in history on climate and energy policy,” said Fred Krupp, president of the New York-based Environmental Defense Fund.”
Although backers of Proposition 23, conceded defeat, they called the outcome “a victory for Wall Street over Main Street” vowing to continue their efforts to “save jobs” and curb energy costs. Iâ€™m a little confused. When I look at the contributors to the fight for and against Proposition 23, I might say it was a victory for Wall Street over Wall Street, because on one side are the likes of Microsoft and Apple, on the other is Big Oil. It reminds me of the Harlequin, turn one way it is dark, turn the other it is light, but overall, it is the same, but thatâ€™s the subject of another post.
Continuing with the Chronicle, â€œ”Millions of voters have said they see clean-energy jobs as the path forward through a tough economic climate,” Krupp said.â€ For us, as project managers, that is key. We need to continue to â€œsurf the green wave.â€ Green jobs mean green projects, mean project managers to manage those projects.
Donâ€™t you think that those sponsors of green projects would rather have someone familiar with the reasons, the driving forces, behind the green wave, to manage their projects? For further information on how you get SMARTER* on this â€œgreen revolutionâ€ see our book and follow us on this site. The revolution is here, evidenced by the defeat of Californiaâ€™s Prop 23 and a continued emphasis on tax incentives for alternate energy development.
*From Green Project Management, CRC Press (Specific, Measurable, Agreed Upon, Realistic, Timely, and Environmentally Responsible)
We were hard pressed to think that we would ever write about the alignment of President Obama, Governor Schwarzenegger, James Cameron and the companies of Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Intel, but we are. These and others, including the California Teachers Association, the American Lung Association, and the CA League of Women Voters, are banding together to work for the defeat of Proposition 23 in California. Proposition 23 would effectively suspend AB32, AKA the Global Warming Act of 2006. Prop 23 ties California’s unemployment rate to AB32. AB32 would be suspended until California’s unemployment rate sinks to 5.5% or less and stays there for a year. AB32 is one of the initiatives we document in our book.
On the other side, in support of Prop 23, some strange bedfellows, too, like the CA Firefighter’s Association, The Coalition of Labor, Agriculture & Business, and the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry, traditionally democrat, and the CA Republican Party (sans the governor). According to http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2010/03/ab-32-ballot-initiative-global-warming-california-climate-change.html Ted Costa, head of the Peoples Advocate, withdrew initial support in March 2010, saying, “”Big money interests have come in and shut out the people.”
There’s pretty big money on both sides of the issue. Louise Bedsworth, a research fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California, predicted in April that total campaign spending on Proposition 23 could top the $154 million record set in 2006 by Proposition 87. (http://tinyurl.com/prop23-cost). The largest contributors on the support side are some CA based oil companies, oil refiner companies, or companies and associations supporting the oil and gas industry. The largest contributors on the “Vote No” side are the companies listed in the beginning of this post.
To quote from our book, “There may be quite a debate around the true causes (of global climate change) are, but one only has to look at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (2007) to answer the question on whether or not there is a significant change in the world’s climate….” the recent trend may or may not be part of a “much larger cycle”, but it is clear that something is going on and that green house gas emissions are contributing to the change.
As project managers, at the least, we need to know how the vote goes. No one is really sure how many jobs (projects) are being created and maintained while companies work to comply with AB32, but we can speculate that if Proposition 23 passes, those jobs will vaporize, except for those companies who agree with our assertion that “a project run with green intent is the right thing to do…”
And this is no British fantasy comedy, but the largest solar project ever to be built on U.S. public land. A $6 billion solar power project has been approved by the Obama administration. It is the start of a boom in solar power on federal lands. This project will be built in the Mojave Desert near Blythe, California. “Today is a day that makes me excited about the nation’s future,” (Ken) Salazar said Monday at a news conference. “This project shows in a real way how harnessing our own renewable resources can create good jobs here at home.”
The Blythe Project, being developed by Solar Millennium, a German solar developer, is slated for more than 7,000 acres of public land near the Arizona border, some 225 miles east of Los Angeles. According to Rachel Rossitto at www.tonic.com, this project alone will be generate 1,000 megawatts of power, is expected to take care of more than 300,000 homes as well as hire 1,066 workers during construction and create 295 permanent positions. The project is the sixth solar power development approved by the Interior Department this month – all in California and Nevada. Approval of a seventh project – also in California – is expected in the next few weeks. All could start transmitting electricity by the end of 2011 or early 2012. At full capacity, the seven projects would generate more than 3,000 megawatts of power and provide electricity for up to 2 million homes.
The bureau opened federally owned lands in 2005 to solar development, but an examination of records and interviews of officials by The Associated Press showed the program operated a first-come, first-served leasing system that quickly overwhelmed its small staff and enabled companies, regardless of solar industry experience, to squat on land without any real plans to develop it. To expedite environmental review and bureaucratic red tape, the Interior Department identified 14 of the most promising solar projects among the more than 180 current permit applications covering about 23 million acres of federally owned desert in the Southwest. Those 14 “fast-track” projects alone would produce more than 6,000 megawatts, enough to power 4 million homes for a day at peak usage, officials said.
Final approval by the end of the year qualifies the solar projects for federal funds under the economic stimulus law approved last year. Solar Millennium is eligible to secure $1.9 billion in conditional loan guarantees from the Energy Department for the Blythe project.
And looking beyond the traditional boundaries of a project, the company will be required to mitigate the project’s effect on more than 8,000 acres of habitat for the desert tortoise, western burrowing owl, bighorn sheep and Mojave fringe-toed lizard, as part of an agreement with federal officials.
There are a couple of pertinent Green Project Management principles that come out of this announcement. It is clearly a “Green by Intent” project and for sure part of the “Green Wave” of environmental awareness. Additionally, it has the important element of considering what happens beyond the traditional deliverable of the output of the project. While we applaud the green power initiative, we are just as excited about the green project management elements the project displays.